Tag Archive: berry

Rewards

subtract

This is a new painting I’ve just completed, called “Subtract“. I’m submitting it in the present Illustration Friday theme. It’s a bit of a departure for me since I mostly do minimalist landscapes on paper. This is a large 2′x3′ (24″x36″; 61cm x 91.5cm) acrylic on canvas, gallery-wrapped (no staples on the side, so ready to hang!).

While I was painting this piece, I was thinking of a theme that seems to be emerging in my mind quite a bit lately, and that is the theme of hope. I had to admit to myself that over the many years doing my vocation overseeing communities, I’ve experienced a great deal of disappointment. My love for community and passion for it has been ridiculed and rejected by so many. Also, in the past, those in authority over me have launched attacks against me because of my ideas of community and the implementation of those ideas. The difficult challenges and immeasurable losses over these many years have eroded my hope and undermined my optimism.

A couple of weeks ago I read a compilation of conversations with Wendell Berry. I’ve always loved reading his essays and found them so powerfully true. He says:

It just means making a commitment and hanging on, and never giving up. As long as you’ve got the life and willpower to continue, you continue. All that’s based on a faith that my experience, to some extent, proves out- if you hang on, you’ll see your way through whatever it is that’s difficult- that there’s going to be a reward. I believe that; it’s my profoundest operating belief. Something will come. Out of the impasse, something will come that you’ll be glad to know. I don’t have enough faith in myself to believe the next choice I would make would be better than the one’s I’ve already made… I think that I’ve been blessed in all the choices I’ve made, but I don’t think that I would have found out that I was blessed if I hadn’t kept to those choices.

I was caught by surprise when I read that. Berry is not just a writer, but also a farmer who works 120 acres in Kentucky in the most wholesome way possible. Farming is one of the strongest analogies to my vocation and community oversight. So when I read this, I realized that I had let my hope wane and that I had no sense that anything I had been doing was going to bear fruit. And when I lost hope in the possibility of reward, that’s undoubtedly when my energy drains and my work weakens.

Then, just the other day as I was reading Bearing the Cross… Garrow’s biography of Martin Luther King, Jr., I read something King said:

One knows deep down within there is something in the very structure of the cosmos that will ultimately bring about fulfillment and the triumph of that which is right. And this is the only thing that can keep one going in difficult periods.

Again, when I read that, I was shocked at how crippled I had allowed my hope to become. I had let my unalterable belief in that be altered. I do believe in what I do for the people is best. I do believe in community. But I’ve permitted the constant resistance and hardships to rob me of my most essential ingredient to doing this kind of work, and that is hope. If I really believe in what I believe, then I will work with all that is within me to realize the reality I see.

Check out my tees HERE and my art, including this painting, HERE.

Simple Pleasures

liz-and-casile-trampoline-034-1_2.jpgThis is a picture of my daughter smelling a rose. Casile manipulated the photo herself. I think it is beautiful and shows talent. We miss the simple beauty. We neglect the finer things. We don’t stop and smell the roses because we don’t even notice the roses.I’m continuing my read of the fascinating collection of essays by the essayist and farmer Wendell Berry called Citizenship Papers. Here’s a paragraph:

Last summer my granddaughter, Virginia, who was eleven, put in some long days on the tobacco setter. She was good at it, and all of us are pleased with her. She told her mother: “What is good about hard work is that it teaches you about little pleasures.” She said that when the weather was hot and a little breeze came, it made her happy and she was grateful. I think this is something very important to know. I hope that, when the time comes, this knowledge of little pleasures will preserve her from the common assumption that pleasures have to be big, expensive, and dangerous.

Ah… a breeze! I’m going to stop and enjoy it!

Go or Get Dragged!

dolce_gabbana_tokyo.jpgPrepare for the desert! Hitchens makes a strong statement in his book God is Not Dead:

To ‘choose’ dogma and faith over doubt and experiment is to throw out the ripening vintage and to reach greedily for the Kool-Aid.

Which reminded me of something that Wendell Berry wrote in in his book, The Unsettling of America. Berry believes the pursuit of truth is better than the protection of it. Once the mind has “consented to be orthodox”, then it becomes “narrow, rigid, mercenary, morally corrupt, and vengeful against dissenters.” He says this is the nature of orthodoxy: “one who presumes to know the truth does not look for it”. He continues:

The pattern of orthodoxy in religion, because it is well known, gives us a useful paradigm. The encrusted religious structure is not changed by its institutional dependents– they are part of the crust. It is changed by one who goes alone to the wilderness, where he fasts and prays, and returns with cleansed vision. In going alone, he goes independent of institutions, forswearing orthodoxy (‘right opinion’). In going to the wilderness he goes to the margin, where he is surrounded by the possibilities– by no means all good– that orthodoxy has excluded. By fasting he disengages his thoughts from the immediate issues of livelihood; his willing hunger takes his mind off the payroll, so to speak. And by praying he acknowledges ignorance; the orthodox presume to know, whereas the marginal person is trying to find out. He returns to the community not necessarily with new truth, but with a new vision of the truth he see it more whole than before.

All religions and their adherents need to prepare themselves to enter into this very desert now, to admit that we do not “know” and finally embrace doubt and mystery. I think we must initiate this willingly and humbly because we are going to be dragged there otherwise.

The fine art photograph is the creation of my friend Mark Hemmings.

Is Dissent a Bad Word?

l_44454a4d9793d7bad518507a20c97a941.jpgI’m again digging into one of my favorite books that I’ve invested in, the great American essayist Wendell Berry’s Citizenship Papers. Here’s a quote:

But the proposition that anything so multiple and large as a nation can be good is an insult to common sense. It is also dangerous, because it precludes any attempt at self-criticism or self-correction; it precludes public dialogue. It leads us far indeed from the traditions of religion and democracy that are intended to measure and so to sustain our efforts to be good. “There is none good but one, that is, God,” Christ said. Also: “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” And Thomas Jefferson justified general education by the obligation of citizens to be critical of their government: “for nothing can keep it right but their own vigilant and distrustful superintendence.” An inescapable requirement of true patriotism, love for one’s land, is a vigilant distrust of any determinative power, elected or unelected, that may preside over it.

Berry is careful, I think, to separate the person from the position. In other words, I would hope my people would trust me as a person. But when I am in a role as pastor, then I expect and hope that this “vigilant distrust of any determinative power” would exist. Of course, it is most difficult to separate the person from the office, but I think the distinction is important. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely (Lord Acton). I may be fine as a person, but in a position of responsibility I am exposed to new temptations, evils and powers. If I’m doing my job well, then there will be vigilant and vibrant discussion, disagreement, and even dissent. The cream is agreement. So, religious overseers: more questions:

  1. Do you humbly handle criticism as the overseer of your community without necessarily taking it personally?
  2. Does everyone play in your community? In other words, does everyone have a voice, even if it is a dissenting one?
  3. Do you reward affirmation and punish criticism?
  4. Do you admit your own errors and evils, or do you wait for a confrontation before you will criticize and correct yourself?
  5. Do you choose those you are accountable to, or do you allow the whole community direct access to the means of dissent?

That’s enough for now. The beautiful tatoo is the creation of my friend Zara Leaf.

Oh No… Not Leaders & Elders Again?

A few weeks ago I wrote an extremely popular post on Leaders and Elders that received over 150 comments. This following quote is given in the context of this same argument. Wendell Berry, the great American essayist, novelist, poet and farmer, in his book, The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture, writes something that has stayed with me for years:

Amish ministers and bishops are chosen by lot, after fasting and prayer (as Mathias was chosen), and so they do not have a professional, a paid, an economically independent, or an ambitious clergy. Their religious services are held in barns or homes; their charities are not organized or abstract but are usually in direct response to observed needs. And so they do not have a church building or a building fund or church functionaries or administrators. There is little distinction between the church and its members.

Don’t Break What You Didn’t Make!

tree_photos_s.jpgThe great American essayist, Wendell Berry, in his important collection of essays, The Unsettling of America, writes:

It is possible, I think, to say that this is a Christian agriculture, formed upon the understanding that it is sinful for people to misuse or destroy what they did not make. The Creation is a unique, irreplaceable gift, therefore to be used with humility, respect, and skill.

I love reading Berry. He has such a beautiful and powerful way with words. His writing is very direct and challenging to our notions of ambition, success and personal growth and well-being. Berry bought a small farm in Kentucky, his home state, in 1965, and has farmed it to the present day. He’s also written over 25 books of poems, 16 collections of essays, 11 novels and short story collections. His deep conviction is that our work should be deeply rooted and responsive to one’s place.

The photograph is from my friend, Mark Hemmings’ nature photography.

Be Here Now!

I found this self-description over at this now unfortunately defunct online magazine. It reminds me of my favorite American essayists, Wendell Berry:

Ours can largely be summed up as a localist, decentralist, anarcho-Christian and authentically conservative approach to politics and culture. As we have written previously, we believe that to suffer one’s place and one’s people in the particularity of its and their needs is the only true basis for finding love, friendship, and an authentic, meaningful life. This is nothing less than the key to the pursuit of Christian holiness, which is the whole of the Christian adventure: to live in love with the frailty and limits of one’s existence, suffering the places, customs, rites, joys, and sorrows of the people who are in close relation to you by family, friendship, and community–all in service of the truth, goodness, and beauty that is best experienced directly. The discipline of place teaches that it is more than enough to care skillfully and lovingly for one’s own little circle, and this is the model for the good life, not the limitless jurisdiction of the ego, granted by a doctrine of choice, that is ever seeking its own fulfillment, pleasure, and satiation.

I love it!

the institutional religious fracture

Wendell Berry, the great American essayist, in his book The Unsettling of America, writes:

This separation of the soul from the body and from the world is no disease of the fringe, no aberration, but a fracture that runs through the mentality of institutional religion like a geological fault. And this rift in the mentality of religion continues to characterize the modern mind, no matter how secular or worldly it becomes.