<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaunt with Jesus #8: Smooth!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/939/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/939</link>
	<description>David Hayward is a pastor artistically stripping to the essential.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/939/comment-page-1#comment-7206</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedpastor.com/archives/939#comment-7206</guid>
		<description>sad, but true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sad, but true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/939/comment-page-1#comment-7205</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nakedpastor.com/archives/939#comment-7205</guid>
		<description>This perfectly encapsulates a theory put forth in an essay by economist Laurence Iannaccone. His essay was the subject of an article in &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2118313/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Slate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt; a while back. 
His argument was that strict requirements by some churches get adherents a better product due to the filtering out of the uninitiated. Just like artificially higher housing costs may keep a neighborhood desirable by keeping out lower income people. 
(I&#039;m not making any judgments, it&#039;s just an analogy.)
The markets for intangible goods can really lend insight into the human psyche. It&#039;s an aspect of economics that has the potential to enlighten psychology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This perfectly encapsulates a theory put forth in an essay by economist Laurence Iannaccone. His essay was the subject of an article in <i><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2118313/" rel="nofollow">Slate</a></i> a while back.<br />
His argument was that strict requirements by some churches get adherents a better product due to the filtering out of the uninitiated. Just like artificially higher housing costs may keep a neighborhood desirable by keeping out lower income people.<br />
(I&#8217;m not making any judgments, it&#8217;s just an analogy.)<br />
The markets for intangible goods can really lend insight into the human psyche. It&#8217;s an aspect of economics that has the potential to enlighten psychology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
