cartoon: within or without

If you like what nakedpastor has to say, your support is appreciated.

29 Responses to cartoon: within or without
  1. Kim
    June 15, 2010 | 8:38 am

    hmm, perhaps both/and?

  2. Alise
    June 15, 2010 | 8:39 am

    Beautiful. Absolutely love this one.

  3. dcsloan
    June 15, 2010 | 8:59 am

    There is nothing sadder or more frightening than a pastor/church/denomination living the idolatry of the left image while ignoring or opposing the truth of the right image.

  4. ppoe
    June 15, 2010 | 9:10 am

    I’m with Kim. ‘both/and’

  5. stacey robbins
    June 15, 2010 | 9:12 am

    love the way you look at life. :-)

  6. Charles Roberts
    June 15, 2010 | 9:12 am

    Best one EVER!! Can I use it?

  7. Bruce Dawson
    June 15, 2010 | 9:13 am

    Man David, this one is a classic!!!

  8. Paul
    June 15, 2010 | 9:22 am

    Outstanding! It’s amazing how much one simple picture can covey!

  9. Dr Campbell
    June 15, 2010 | 9:50 am

    …what is being done to change it

  10. Prometeo
    June 15, 2010 | 9:59 am

    So simple yet so deep. No need for words on this one.

    Good.

  11. nakedpastor
    June 15, 2010 | 10:22 am

    anyone can share it online. sure. just link to nakedpastor.

  12. Alex
    June 15, 2010 | 1:46 pm

    Love how squished the first GOD is, and how majestic the second one is…another great one, David

  13. Societyvs
    June 15, 2010 | 4:02 pm

    So true, about church and it’s systemic way of bargaining a view of God that can be limited and controlled for the sake of ‘humanity’.

  14. Fred
    June 15, 2010 | 4:23 pm

    I like it, np.

  15. dcsloan
    June 15, 2010 | 5:21 pm

    As I have said before…

    God has never been, at any time for any reason, a capricious God of death, war, destruction, murder, violence, retribution, vengeance, or hate.

    God has always been a consistent God of life, peace, creation, healing, reconciliation, resurrection, transformation, grace, mercy, and love.

    …and this NP cartoon says it better, more pointedly, and much more concisely.

  16. The Prodigal Prophet
    June 15, 2010 | 5:35 pm

    Brilliant David.

    I just wonder if the little church is there at all?

    One to ponder over!

  17. Janina
    June 15, 2010 | 6:29 pm

    love this

  18. Titfortat
    June 15, 2010 | 9:57 pm

    Hey David

    Denise thinks this is your best work. Kudos. Love it.

  19. bob
    June 16, 2010 | 6:19 am

    dcsloan – “God has never been, at any time for any reason, a capricious God of death, war, destruction, murder, violence, retribution, vengeance, or hate.”

    “God has always been a consistent God of life, peace, creation, healing, reconciliation, resurrection, transformation, grace, mercy, and love.”

    ?

  20. dcsloan
    June 16, 2010 | 10:55 am

    Bob,

    The collected stories of faith that we call The Bible reveals how, over many centuries, people matured and grew in their understanding of God. God never changed. Our understanding of and relationship with God did change – and God was always calling us forward to a better, wiser, more loving understanding and relationship.

  21. bob
    June 16, 2010 | 11:51 am

    I guess I don’t understand. Are you saying all the people who were killed by God (and / or His followers at His command) in the Old Testament were just part of a grand lesson to bring YOU, dcsloan, closer to God some 4,000 years later?
    I mean, do you really see absolutely no difference (“God never changed”) between the God of Deuteronomy and the God of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John?

    “…and God was always calling us forward to a better, wiser, more loving understanding and relationship.”

    This is all fine and good, but it seems to do little for those lived and died during the time of the Old Testament God…I mean, if any of those stories are even remotely true.

    ““God has always been a consistent God of life, peace, creation, healing, reconciliation, resurrection, transformation, grace, mercy, and love.”

    This just seems to be a god of your own making, which is OK by me, but it just doesn’t match up with the biblical God.

  22. dcsloan
    June 16, 2010 | 1:34 pm

    Bob,

    It matches up with a God who is consistent.

    It does not match up with an inconsistent, even capricious, God – which is how God was viewed in the Old Testament. The stories are true, just not necessarily factually accurate. God is a God of grace – the BC people are just fine with God.

  23. bob
    June 16, 2010 | 2:08 pm

    OK. Thanks for clearing it all up for me…and them.

  24. Berean Girl
    June 16, 2010 | 10:09 pm

    So simple, yet so powerful. A picture really does speak a thousand words.

  25. Giovanni
    June 17, 2010 | 11:18 am

    I simply reshared this on all the networks I know :)

  26. Charles Roberts
    June 17, 2010 | 11:32 am

    Just read this quote in the late Michael Spencer’s book “Mere Churchianity” – “…leaving the god who sponsored the religious agenda was, for many people, the only way to hold on to an authentic idea of God. Leaving the Jesus who was said to be in the building was the only way to believe in a Jesus who wasn’t confined to a building.”

  27. fogster
    June 21, 2010 | 12:47 am

    Amen

  28. hannah
    June 21, 2010 | 6:41 pm

    love this!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks
  1. Two Views of God – Michael Krahn : The Ascent to Truth
Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/5494/trackback