<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: cartoon: fire alarm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128</link>
	<description>David Hayward is an artist trapped in a pastor&#039;s body, stripping to the essential.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nathan the alien</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128/comment-page-1#comment-94330</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan the alien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=3128#comment-94330</guid>
		<description>Any cartoon with the word &#039;historicity&#039; get&#039;s a big thumbs up.  I can&#039;t stop saying it, it feels great...&#039;historicity&#039;, &#039;historicity&#039;, &#039;historicity&#039;, &#039;historicity&#039;, &#039;historicity&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any cartoon with the word &#8216;historicity&#8217; get&#8217;s a big thumbs up.  I can&#8217;t stop saying it, it feels great&#8230;&#8217;historicity&#8217;, &#8216;historicity&#8217;, &#8216;historicity&#8217;, &#8216;historicity&#8217;, &#8216;historicity&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishon</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128/comment-page-1#comment-94285</link>
		<dc:creator>fishon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=3128#comment-94285</guid>
		<description>FiF,
I reread what you said. Yep, &quot;a sharp point on my [your] reply.&quot; I take back my arrogant statement. I jumped to fast. I can take sharp. Heck, I do have a sharp edge to my writing, I am told. 
fishon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FiF,<br />
I reread what you said. Yep, &#8220;a sharp point on my [your] reply.&#8221; I take back my arrogant statement. I jumped to fast. I can take sharp. Heck, I do have a sharp edge to my writing, I am told.<br />
fishon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faithlessinfatima</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128/comment-page-1#comment-94270</link>
		<dc:creator>faithlessinfatima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=3128#comment-94270</guid>
		<description>Fishon, if that sounded too arrogant, forgive me, but I did intend to put a sharp point on my reply...it just seems that yr comments reflect a resistance to think  outside of yr box ...I mean ,look at yr first reply...what else cd I think?

And I assure you that my knowledge of biblical controversies is miniscule, but the one were discussing I have spent some time looking into,it&#039;s very intriguing to me that these things exist alongside each other...as I said earlier,John&#039;s gospel is a good example of historical detail(with respect to the synoptics) seemingly playing second fiddle to a developing narrative(the Johanine tradition).That&#039;s not what we moderns  want,but a close reading of all the gospels shld help us to expect the unexpected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fishon, if that sounded too arrogant, forgive me, but I did intend to put a sharp point on my reply&#8230;it just seems that yr comments reflect a resistance to think  outside of yr box &#8230;I mean ,look at yr first reply&#8230;what else cd I think?</p>
<p>And I assure you that my knowledge of biblical controversies is miniscule, but the one were discussing I have spent some time looking into,it&#8217;s very intriguing to me that these things exist alongside each other&#8230;as I said earlier,John&#8217;s gospel is a good example of historical detail(with respect to the synoptics) seemingly playing second fiddle to a developing narrative(the Johanine tradition).That&#8217;s not what we moderns  want,but a close reading of all the gospels shld help us to expect the unexpected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishon</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/3128/comment-page-1#comment-94265</link>
		<dc:creator>fishon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=3128#comment-94265</guid>
		<description>Yep, Semety,
I was wondering about that last sentence myself.
fishon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Semety,<br />
I was wondering about that last sentence myself.<br />
fishon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
