Guilty As Accused

scan10001-12Last night I was told about someone… he and his whole family… life-long members of the Christian church… they left the church (not mine but theirs) for certain reasons. They are incredibly wounded because of things that were done to them. Without going into detail… they are done with church. They still love the Lord, but they are devastated, including their children, and they don’t want to risk subjecting themselves to that kind of harm ever again. My immediate verbal and unedited reaction was, “Oh! I love those people!” Not meaning just that particular family, but people like them. I know exactly what they are feeling. I’ve so been there. And my heart is moved deeply by such stories. I care so much for such people. They are my mission field. And it seems to be growing!

I believe they are victims, like many others I know and hear about, including myself. I am a walking survivor of spiritual abuse. I know intimately what it means. These people have suffered at the hands of the church. This is what I care about! I don’t think, I could be wrong, but I don’t think the church has the right to criticize them or challenge them… at least right now. I think they have the right to criticize the church. To criticize us. To criticize me!

If we, as the church, feel we are the church and are concerned about the welfare of all people, then I believe we must listen to all criticisms that are filed against us. Don’t you? I don’t think I am inaccurate to say that the church is guilty of and is constantly accused of abuse against its members. I feel we must listen to this and humbly absorb the possibility of this and make every attempt to rectify this… if we care at all about people like this family.

So, that being said, when someone claims they left the church and the faith because of the treatment he received at our hands, I think all mortal flesh should keep silence and listen to that with fear and trembling. Now is not the time to challenge them, but to challenge ourselves. On the last day, when I stand before the judgment seat, I don’t want to be accused of not listening to my brother just outside my gate, especially if I was possibly the one who locked him out there.

When I went through devastating abuse at the hands of church leaders, I didn’t need fixing. I didn’t need persuading. I didn’t need correcting. I didn’t need to hear their side. All I needed was to be heard. I finally found people that would just listen to me, hear my anguish, affirm my complaint, and love me as wounded as I was. In time, when the sharpness of the wounds subsided and the tears dried and my heart started beating again, I opened my eyes and realized that those very people who were just listening were my community. They’d become my church. They’d given me a spiritual home. And now I feel strengthened to go after the rest splattered all over the battlefield we’ve created.

I realize some might say, “There you go with your generalizations again… we, we, we! You’re not talking about me!” But isn’t it biblical, at times, to take upon ourselves the responsibility of the whole church and even the whole human race? Isn’t is right to occasionally fall on our knees just because we are a part of the human race prone to harming others and a part of an organization prone to abuse, and say, “Guilty as accused!“?

The drawing/ sketch is one of mind, based on an image I saw in a dream recently, called “Jesus Suffers Among Precious Stones”, available as a small print here.

If you like what nakedpastor has to say, your support is appreciated.

103 Responses to Guilty As Accused
  1. Steve Lancaster
    February 5, 2009 | 12:22 pm

    Faithlessinfatima,

    Too much! Too much nice stuff! (Noting Dave has done a cartoon on emoticons, I’m really tempted to put a ‘blushing’ emoticon here…)

    I really do agree with you that we are able to make a distinction between naked interface with God and theology – with the proviso (see, I have ‘buts’ too) that I’m not going to hold it against anyone if they don’t think that distinction is possible. This because it was all theory to me until I experienced it, and as I’ve explained, I do not in any way see how I rationally chose for the experience to happen.

    It’s the nature of Love I come back to again and again, and the story of Jesus communicates it exactly. Somehow Love is there when you can sense it – but also when it seems to be absent. So Jesus senses the Love of (that at the same time actually is) his Father, but when he dies, that Love carries him through, and into the realm of myths, and into whatever resurrection lies beyond.

    Take that conception of Love – that it is present even where you cannot imagine it to be, that it allows the death of its own son – and it becomes impossible to conceive of anyone or thing that definitively lacks it. And because that includes you yourself, you are given the confidence to stop worrying whether what you do falls inside or outside traditional definitions of morality.

    I believe Paul is grasping at words to express this when he writes ‘To live is Christ, and to die is gain’. How can you hold anything against someone who, by hurting you, gives you only more of Christ, or Heaven itself? A morality of good actions versus bad ones is blown out of the water. Instead the whole of life becomes a celebration.

    What do you think? I know Christianity, so I use examples from it, but I’m convinced this experience lies at the heart of all religions and none. It is wonderful, for example, to tell the story of evolution in terms of a celebration of Love. In this spirit I commend the work of the ‘new atheists’ to you. If you’ve never read Karen Armstrong, I’d recommend her, too – and Pete Rollins…

  2. faithlessinfatima
    February 6, 2009 | 4:08 pm

    Steve L…I have read and enjoyed K. Armstrong’s ‘ History of God ‘and I do have her ‘A Short History of Myth’…she has an interesting life story as well…Sam Harris is definitely my go-to ‘New Atheist ‘guy,I’ve caught him being a little naive with certain scriptural interpretations,but nevertheless,a brilliant mind and a gentle spirit…on the other hand,Dawkins, which I have not read,but viewed some online material puts me in mind of St. Paul…I have a feeling they might be two peas in a pod,albeit one sweet,the other sour…take yr pick?.I was totally unaware of P. Rollins,checked out his site…interesting condiments for those who like their Borg Crossanwiches.

    In the end,I’m enjoying my new found freedom that doesn’t equate my faith with my theology.My faith is my existential response to a profoundly compelling mystery.My theology is the house I invite my faith to live in…like all houses,there will be ongoing renovations.Thx for yr input.

  3. Steve Lancaster
    February 9, 2009 | 11:53 am

    “In the end,I’m enjoying my new found freedom that doesn’t equate my faith with my theology.My faith is my existential response to a profoundly compelling mystery.My theology is the house I invite my faith to live in…like all houses,there will be ongoing renovations.”

    I like your description very much – it’s challenged me in good ways. So simple!

    Thanks to you too.

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2670/trackback