<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inscrutable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565</link>
	<description>David Hayward is an artist trapped in a pastor&#039;s body, stripping to the essential.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Semety</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565/comment-page-1#comment-77294</link>
		<dc:creator>Semety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=2565#comment-77294</guid>
		<description>What if god isn&#039;t there at all, fish? Wouldn&#039;t that be hopelessness?

clingy would be so much better, but it&#039;s so hard to do, and if it is hopeless, is it better to realise that? or just keep clinging without anything there, so you don&#039;t realise you&#039;re falling?

i don&#039;t know, maybe God is there and I&#039;m not. i was saved, if I was saved, and if I wasn&#039;t, then I&#039;m not. and that&#039;s terrifying.

Losing hope is terrifying. potentially fatal, but not yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if god isn&#8217;t there at all, fish? Wouldn&#8217;t that be hopelessness?</p>
<p>clingy would be so much better, but it&#8217;s so hard to do, and if it is hopeless, is it better to realise that? or just keep clinging without anything there, so you don&#8217;t realise you&#8217;re falling?</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know, maybe God is there and I&#8217;m not. i was saved, if I was saved, and if I wasn&#8217;t, then I&#8217;m not. and that&#8217;s terrifying.</p>
<p>Losing hope is terrifying. potentially fatal, but not yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faithlessinfatima</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565/comment-page-1#comment-77281</link>
		<dc:creator>faithlessinfatima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=2565#comment-77281</guid>
		<description>JohnO...maybe I led you to believe I was thinking of the interpreters of the NT...not so,but of course the actual writers were also interpreting...I&#039;ll try to clarify...my question was initially prompted by yr statement,

&quot;I do not understand how to square the intense apocalyptic thrust of the faith of the early church&quot;

With that in mind,I was led to think you were referring to certain beliefs about future events,like the imminent return of the Lord.But you also added,

&quot;Well since there are multiple ideas on what they mean, then someone is more “right” and someone more “wrong” even though we might not be in the best position to determine it. &quot;

Which leads me to ask,&quot;If we can be wrong in our interpretation,why can&#039;t they be wrong as well&quot;,and&quot;Are we justified in presupposing a doctrine about scripture that conveniently steers us away from &#039;that road less travelled&#039;?.&quot;It may seem to be off-topic,but I think it&#039;s important when were asking the hard questions aboutwhat we really &#039;do&#039; or &#039;don&#039;t&#039;  know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnO&#8230;maybe I led you to believe I was thinking of the interpreters of the NT&#8230;not so,but of course the actual writers were also interpreting&#8230;I&#8217;ll try to clarify&#8230;my question was initially prompted by yr statement,</p>
<p>&#8220;I do not understand how to square the intense apocalyptic thrust of the faith of the early church&#8221;</p>
<p>With that in mind,I was led to think you were referring to certain beliefs about future events,like the imminent return of the Lord.But you also added,</p>
<p>&#8220;Well since there are multiple ideas on what they mean, then someone is more “right” and someone more “wrong” even though we might not be in the best position to determine it. &#8221;</p>
<p>Which leads me to ask,&#8221;If we can be wrong in our interpretation,why can&#8217;t they be wrong as well&#8221;,and&#8221;Are we justified in presupposing a doctrine about scripture that conveniently steers us away from &#8216;that road less travelled&#8217;?.&#8221;It may seem to be off-topic,but I think it&#8217;s important when were asking the hard questions aboutwhat we really &#8216;do&#8217; or &#8216;don&#8217;t&#8217;  know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnO</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565/comment-page-1#comment-77234</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=2565#comment-77234</guid>
		<description>infatima,

Well since there are multiple ideas on what they mean, then someone is more &quot;right&quot; and someone more &quot;wrong&quot; even though we might not be in the best position to determine it.  I am convinced in myself that I have been wrong in the past, and am getting &quot;righter&quot;... I certainly haven&#039;t arrived.. nor do I expect to.  So in that way, I hope I humbly approach the nakedpastor&#039;s feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>infatima,</p>
<p>Well since there are multiple ideas on what they mean, then someone is more &#8220;right&#8221; and someone more &#8220;wrong&#8221; even though we might not be in the best position to determine it.  I am convinced in myself that I have been wrong in the past, and am getting &#8220;righter&#8221;&#8230; I certainly haven&#8217;t arrived.. nor do I expect to.  So in that way, I hope I humbly approach the nakedpastor&#8217;s feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faithlessinfatima</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedpastor.com/archives/2565/comment-page-1#comment-77231</link>
		<dc:creator>faithlessinfatima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedpastor.com/?p=2565#comment-77231</guid>
		<description>JohnO...there are reputable scholars on both sides of the debate as to what Jesus said,meant and actually believed...I wd think there is less controversy about the apostle&#039;s(some,at least) belief in the imminent return of the Lord..I&#039;m not trying to defend a particular position,but raise questions as to how we read those documents.In yr thinking,cd they have been wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnO&#8230;there are reputable scholars on both sides of the debate as to what Jesus said,meant and actually believed&#8230;I wd think there is less controversy about the apostle&#8217;s(some,at least) belief in the imminent return of the Lord..I&#8217;m not trying to defend a particular position,but raise questions as to how we read those documents.In yr thinking,cd they have been wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
